The Importance Of Being Harpo
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
  Robbed
The day is only a couple of hours old and I've already heard several people tell me “we wuz robbed” and comment on the perverse injustice of the terrible penalty call at the end of the match.

This is the cry of the football novice—the bandwagon passenger. I am going to spend the day sighing through a number of these conversations getting relief in the thought that thereafter another word about football will not cross their lips for another four years.

It wasn't a penalty but Neill naïvely went down earlier than a cheerleader with a curfew (Neill had a superb tournament but he should know that lying down in front of a player with the ball at his foot is not an effective way of stopping him) and all Grosso had to do was to stroll up close to the body prone on the ground and then throw himself down next to it, at least eight out of ten referees would have given the penalty.

In a competition like this you are always going to get decisions like that go against you. You certainly don't have to like it. You can trudge home—as I did—fuming, aghast, not looking at the many hundreds of people milling about in the city as you pray you don't spot any celebrating Italians, but you can't pretend you were born with the right not to have such things happen to you.

Decisions were always going to go against Australia: think of the Japanese goal, think of the bizarre protection Brazil got—four times as many frees as Australia did—prompting Kewell's outburst, think of Poll's comedic genius in the Croatia game. But this is football and things went our way too: Kewell was lucky to get away with his little tizz, he was also lucky to get away with the equaliser in the next game when he was a metre offside, think also of Materazzi's soft red card this morning.

Referees get a lot of decisions wrong. It's that simple. If you happen to be an overwhelming favourite the mistakes often go in your favour. That is football. If you only notice it when it occurs in the final moments of a match in the knockout phase of the world's biggest sporting event then, I'm afraid, you've arrived late at the party.

 
Comments:
'but Neill naïvely went down earlier than a cheerleader with a curfew...'

ohhh. gold harpo. literary brilliance.
 
Ha! Thank you mel.

Yes, you can always rely on cheerleaders.
 
We are very proud of our team. The whole country was noisily and wholly behind the team. You are right, rebecca, the Aussies did very well but, I hope you don't take this the wrong way, we weren't really comparing our level of success against that of the US.

It's OK if not so many people care about the soccer. Astoundingly, I'm told that Americans don't much like cricket either. While I do shake my head in bewilderment at that one let's just agree that not everybody has to like everything. The game is just as enjoyable even if the whole country isn't behind it (unless the TV coverage is compromised. How well was the world cup covered in the states this time?)

Give the US team credit though: they got a gallant draw against Italy. We didn't manage that.
 
I hoped you liked it. I have been really enjoying this world cup.

And I reckon that 2010 will be your year!
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

My Photo
Name:
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Is rumoured to have hobbies.


Contact
Send stuff to my email address

Archives
June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / July 2008 / July 2010 /